https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431732 Wilful disobedience of a writ court direction to quash a notice and consequential action was treated as civil contempt where the adverse demand continued to appear on the web portal for about seven months after the order. The court held that deletion only after the contempt proceedings were initiated supported a finding of deliberate non-compliance. Objections based on jurisdiction, change of address, and the absence of a transfer order under the income-tax regime were rejected as no answer to the failure to implement the earlier judicial direction. The court therefore found civil contempt proved and imposed punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431732 Wilful disobedience of a writ court direction to quash a notice and consequential action was treated as civil contempt where the adverse demand continued to appear on the web portal for about seven months after the order. The court held that deletion only after the contempt proceedings were initiated supported a finding of deliberate non-compliance. Objections based on jurisdiction, change of address, and the absence of a transfer order under the income-tax regime were rejected as no answer to the failure to implement the earlier judicial direction. The court therefore found civil contempt proved and imposed punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431732