<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 836 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) erred in invoking Section 154 of the Income Tax Act to disallow the set-off of carried forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal concluded that the AO lacked jurisdiction under Section 154 as the issue involved was a mixed question of fact and law, not a mistake apparent on record. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the assessee company qualified as &quot;a company in which the public are substantially interested,&quot; rendering Section 79 inapplicable. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the AO&#039;s action and allowed the set-off of losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 836 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) erred in invoking Section 154 of the Income Tax Act to disallow the set-off of carried forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal concluded that the AO lacked jurisdiction under Section 154 as the issue involved was a mixed question of fact and law, not a mistake apparent on record. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the assessee company qualified as &quot;a company in which the public are substantially interested,&quot; rendering Section 79 inapplicable. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the AO&#039;s action and allowed the set-off of losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>