<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 829 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431712</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the late fee imposition under Section 46(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, for filing a Bill of Entry after the specified time. It ordered a refund to the Appellant, emphasizing procedural fairness, rational decision-making, and adherence to legal precedents in customs matters. The Department was directed to pay a minimum litigation cost to the Appellant due to the irregular imposition of late fees unsupported by legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 829 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431712</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the late fee imposition under Section 46(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, for filing a Bill of Entry after the specified time. It ordered a refund to the Appellant, emphasizing procedural fairness, rational decision-making, and adherence to legal precedents in customs matters. The Department was directed to pay a minimum litigation cost to the Appellant due to the irregular imposition of late fees unsupported by legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>