<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 828 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431711</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to a substantial delay in filing, rejecting the appellant&#039;s attempt to blame the previous counsel. Despite addressing the deposit issue, the tribunal found no sufficient cause to condone the delay. Legal principles cited were deemed inapplicable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:02:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 828 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431711</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to a substantial delay in filing, rejecting the appellant&#039;s attempt to blame the previous counsel. Despite addressing the deposit issue, the tribunal found no sufficient cause to condone the delay. Legal principles cited were deemed inapplicable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>