<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 826 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431709</link>
    <description>The court held that changing the company name from &quot;Inox Air Products Ltd.&quot; to &quot;Inox Air Products Private Limited&quot; did not amount to a transfer of property requiring stamp duty. The impugned order was quashed, directing the respondents to update records without demanding stamp duty payment. The court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s prolonged litigation and urged prompt compliance within four weeks, disposing of the petition and pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 826 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431709</link>
      <description>The court held that changing the company name from &quot;Inox Air Products Ltd.&quot; to &quot;Inox Air Products Private Limited&quot; did not amount to a transfer of property requiring stamp duty. The impugned order was quashed, directing the respondents to update records without demanding stamp duty payment. The court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s prolonged litigation and urged prompt compliance within four weeks, disposing of the petition and pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>