<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 822 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431705</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted leave in a case where the High Court affirmed an order holding a delay beyond the condonable period as unsustainable. The Court found that the appellant was entitled to exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. By excluding the period from filing the writ petition to its dismissal, the appeal fell within the condonable period. Consequently, the Court directed that the delay be condoned, allowing the appeal to be considered on its merits by the Appellate Authority. The judgment focused on the correct interpretation and application of Section 14, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to exclusion of time was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 822 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431705</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted leave in a case where the High Court affirmed an order holding a delay beyond the condonable period as unsustainable. The Court found that the appellant was entitled to exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. By excluding the period from filing the writ petition to its dismissal, the appeal fell within the condonable period. Consequently, the Court directed that the delay be condoned, allowing the appeal to be considered on its merits by the Appellate Authority. The judgment focused on the correct interpretation and application of Section 14, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to exclusion of time was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>