<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 821 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431704</link>
    <description>Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 gives the term &quot;any information or complaint&quot; wide amplitude, so disciplinary proceedings need not depend on a formal written complaint. Rule 7 of the 2007 Rules was held to supplement the statute, not restrict it, and therefore could not narrow the statutory scope of information. A newspaper report by itself is not evidence and cannot, standing alone, justify action; however, where it merely triggers examination of other material such as a review report, disclosures, and applicable auditing standards, the Institute may have sufficient information to initiate inquiry. The challenge to jurisdiction failed because the initiation was based on adequate material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 821 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431704</link>
      <description>Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 gives the term &quot;any information or complaint&quot; wide amplitude, so disciplinary proceedings need not depend on a formal written complaint. Rule 7 of the 2007 Rules was held to supplement the statute, not restrict it, and therefore could not narrow the statutory scope of information. A newspaper report by itself is not evidence and cannot, standing alone, justify action; however, where it merely triggers examination of other material such as a review report, disclosures, and applicable auditing standards, the Institute may have sufficient information to initiate inquiry. The challenge to jurisdiction failed because the initiation was based on adequate material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>