https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305671 The Registration Act, 1908 was treated as a complete code for registration, and the registering authority was held to have no power to cancel or set aside a registered sale deed after registration, even where fraud or impersonation is alleged. In the absence of an express statutory provision or valid rule, administrative action could not annul a completed conveyance, and Article 162 could not override the statute. Disputes raising fraud, title, or the validity of competing sale deeds were held to require evidence and adjudication by a competent civil court, so writ interference was declined. en-us Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:50:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305671 The Registration Act, 1908 was treated as a complete code for registration, and the registering authority was held to have no power to cancel or set aside a registered sale deed after registration, even where fraud or impersonation is alleged. In the absence of an express statutory provision or valid rule, administrative action could not annul a completed conveyance, and Article 162 could not override the statute. Disputes raising fraud, title, or the validity of competing sale deeds were held to require evidence and adjudication by a competent civil court, so writ interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305671