https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305671 The court held that the Assistant Registrar lacks authority to cancel a registered sale deed under the Registration Act, 1908, even in cases of alleged fraud. It emphasized that such deeds can only be challenged in a civil court. The court also clarified that allegations of fraud must be substantiated with evidence before a competent civil court. The judgment highlighted that the Registration Act does not empower the registering authority to annul documents post-registration. The court dismissed a writ petition seeking cancellation of a sale deed, advising the petitioner to pursue the matter through civil court proceedings. en-us Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:50:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305671 The court held that the Assistant Registrar lacks authority to cancel a registered sale deed under the Registration Act, 1908, even in cases of alleged fraud. It emphasized that such deeds can only be challenged in a civil court. The court also clarified that allegations of fraud must be substantiated with evidence before a competent civil court. The judgment highlighted that the Registration Act does not empower the registering authority to annul documents post-registration. The court dismissed a writ petition seeking cancellation of a sale deed, advising the petitioner to pursue the matter through civil court proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305671