<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 193 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31264</link>
    <description>The court upheld the transfer of an assessment case under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act to a new Assessing Officer based on material evidence of inadmissible expenditure by distilleries in U.P. Despite the petitioner&#039;s objections and claims of procedural irregularities, the court found no violation of natural justice and deemed the transfer justified. The respondents were directed to issue a proper show cause notice for transfer, ensuring due process. The court concluded that the transfer decision was supported by sufficient evidence, denying the petitioners&#039; request for intervention through extraordinary jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 193 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31264</link>
      <description>The court upheld the transfer of an assessment case under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act to a new Assessing Officer based on material evidence of inadmissible expenditure by distilleries in U.P. Despite the petitioner&#039;s objections and claims of procedural irregularities, the court found no violation of natural justice and deemed the transfer justified. The respondents were directed to issue a proper show cause notice for transfer, ensuring due process. The court concluded that the transfer decision was supported by sufficient evidence, denying the petitioners&#039; request for intervention through extraordinary jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>