https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305666 The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision regarding the acquittal under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code, emphasizing adherence to statutory limitation periods to prevent unfair prosecutions. The Court analyzed Sections 468 and 469 of the Criminal Procedure Code, ruling that the prosecution was time-barred due to exceeding the limitation period. Emphasizing the importance of upholding limitations in criminal prosecutions, the Court dismissed the appeal, discharged the respondent from bail bonds, and deemed the conviction non-existent. The decision highlighted the necessity of complying with statutory provisions on limitation to ensure fairness in trials. en-us Thu, 02 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305666 The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision regarding the acquittal under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code, emphasizing adherence to statutory limitation periods to prevent unfair prosecutions. The Court analyzed Sections 468 and 469 of the Criminal Procedure Code, ruling that the prosecution was time-barred due to exceeding the limitation period. Emphasizing the importance of upholding limitations in criminal prosecutions, the Court dismissed the appeal, discharged the respondent from bail bonds, and deemed the conviction non-existent. The decision highlighted the necessity of complying with statutory provisions on limitation to ensure fairness in trials. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305666