<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 348 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31260</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods and penalties on the first appellant but reduced the redemption fine. Penalties on the second and third appellants, customs officers, were waived due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in the smuggling. The decision was based on the evidence presented, without prejudice to any departmental actions against the officers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 348 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31260</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods and penalties on the first appellant but reduced the redemption fine. Penalties on the second and third appellants, customs officers, were waived due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in the smuggling. The decision was based on the evidence presented, without prejudice to any departmental actions against the officers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>