<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 785 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431668</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted a thorough inquiry during the original assessment proceedings. The tribunal upheld the original assessment order by the AO, concluding that it was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the PCIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:16:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 785 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431668</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted a thorough inquiry during the original assessment proceedings. The tribunal upheld the original assessment order by the AO, concluding that it was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the PCIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>