<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 781 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, upholding the orders of the CIT(A) and AOs. It found the LTCG claims as bogus, not qualifying for exemptions under section 10(38). Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the justifiability of the additions for commission expenditures. The Tribunal relied on a High Court judgment emphasizing the burden of proof on assessees, the abnormal rise in share prices, and the need to consider the totality of circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 781 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, upholding the orders of the CIT(A) and AOs. It found the LTCG claims as bogus, not qualifying for exemptions under section 10(38). Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the justifiability of the additions for commission expenditures. The Tribunal relied on a High Court judgment emphasizing the burden of proof on assessees, the abnormal rise in share prices, and the need to consider the totality of circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>