<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 779 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431662</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned notices issued under Section 24 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, as the transactions predated the 2016 Amendment Act, which was held to be prospective from 25.10.2016. The court, following a recent Supreme Court judgment, found the notices unsustainable in law and allowed the writ petitions without delving into the merits of the dispute to prevent prejudice. No costs were awarded in disposing of the writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 779 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431662</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned notices issued under Section 24 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, as the transactions predated the 2016 Amendment Act, which was held to be prospective from 25.10.2016. The court, following a recent Supreme Court judgment, found the notices unsustainable in law and allowed the writ petitions without delving into the merits of the dispute to prevent prejudice. No costs were awarded in disposing of the writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>