<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 768 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431651</link>
    <description>The penalties imposed under Rule 26(2)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 on appellants for facilitating fraudulent availment of Cenvat Credit by M./s Archon were upheld. The Member (Judicial) found no infirmity in the impugned order and dismissed the appeals, affirming the penalties for all appellants based on their involvement in the fraudulent passing of credit to M./s Archon.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2022 21:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 768 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431651</link>
      <description>The penalties imposed under Rule 26(2)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 on appellants for facilitating fraudulent availment of Cenvat Credit by M./s Archon were upheld. The Member (Judicial) found no infirmity in the impugned order and dismissed the appeals, affirming the penalties for all appellants based on their involvement in the fraudulent passing of credit to M./s Archon.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>