<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1742 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305658</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the complaint and proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., finding that the allegations did not constitute any offence, the complaint was time-barred, and the offences were not continuing in nature. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and the need for specific allegations in the complaint to make out a prima facie case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:14:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1742 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305658</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the complaint and proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., finding that the allegations did not constitute any offence, the complaint was time-barred, and the offences were not continuing in nature. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and the need for specific allegations in the complaint to make out a prima facie case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>