<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1206 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305657</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the cancellation of the sale deed based on fraud. The petitioner was given the option to pursue appropriate remedies in the pending suit. The judgment reinforced the importance of preventing void transactions resulting from fraud and unauthorized dealings in property, emphasizing the authority of registering officers to cancel such transactions in the interest of justice and public welfare.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:14:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1206 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305657</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the cancellation of the sale deed based on fraud. The petitioner was given the option to pursue appropriate remedies in the pending suit. The judgment reinforced the importance of preventing void transactions resulting from fraud and unauthorized dealings in property, emphasizing the authority of registering officers to cancel such transactions in the interest of justice and public welfare.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>