<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 765 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431648</link>
    <description>The HC examined a GST case involving an expired e-way bill during goods transportation. The court permitted the petitioner to amend the application challenging a penalty order of Rs.6,76,764, acknowledging portal issues preventing timely bill extension. While recognizing procedural constraints under GST Rules, the HC allowed further proceedings, emphasizing the importance of factual analysis and ensuring fairness in legal processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 765 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431648</link>
      <description>The HC examined a GST case involving an expired e-way bill during goods transportation. The court permitted the petitioner to amend the application challenging a penalty order of Rs.6,76,764, acknowledging portal issues preventing timely bill extension. While recognizing procedural constraints under GST Rules, the HC allowed further proceedings, emphasizing the importance of factual analysis and ensuring fairness in legal processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>