https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31248 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal for interest on the payment of differential excise duty, ruling in favor of the respondent. The Tribunal found that the duty was promptly paid upon receiving the amended purchase order, aligning with the precedent set by a High Court decision. As the respondent settled the duty liability without delay and no evidence suggested otherwise, the Tribunal concluded that interest payment under Section 11AB was not applicable. The appeals by the Revenue were rejected, and the Cross-objection was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31248 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal for interest on the payment of differential excise duty, ruling in favor of the respondent. The Tribunal found that the duty was promptly paid upon receiving the amended purchase order, aligning with the precedent set by a High Court decision. As the respondent settled the duty liability without delay and no evidence suggested otherwise, the Tribunal concluded that interest payment under Section 11AB was not applicable. The appeals by the Revenue were rejected, and the Cross-objection was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31248