https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305650 The majority view is that the Registration Act, 1908 and the Rules do not create a general bar on registering a cancellation deed merely because it seeks to revoke an earlier registered sale deed, and the registering officer can refuse registration only on statutory grounds. It further holds that disputes over the validity of sale deeds, cancellation deeds, fraud, misrepresentation, authority, and title involve contested facts and are ordinarily to be tried in civil court, so writ jurisdiction is not the proper forum where an effective civil remedy exists. The dissent took the opposite view, treating unilateral cancellation of a registered sale deed as impermissible. en-us Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2022 15:46:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305650 The majority view is that the Registration Act, 1908 and the Rules do not create a general bar on registering a cancellation deed merely because it seeks to revoke an earlier registered sale deed, and the registering officer can refuse registration only on statutory grounds. It further holds that disputes over the validity of sale deeds, cancellation deeds, fraud, misrepresentation, authority, and title involve contested facts and are ordinarily to be tried in civil court, so writ jurisdiction is not the proper forum where an effective civil remedy exists. The dissent took the opposite view, treating unilateral cancellation of a registered sale deed as impermissible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305650