<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 1029 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, considering the decision to write off the rural electrification subsidy as valid despite being made after the relevant period. The Tribunal found that all conditions for writing off the amount were met, affirming the irrecoverability of the subsidy. The timing of the decision did not invalidate the claim, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 13:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 1029 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, considering the decision to write off the rural electrification subsidy as valid despite being made after the relevant period. The Tribunal found that all conditions for writing off the amount were met, affirming the irrecoverability of the subsidy. The timing of the decision did not invalidate the claim, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>