<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 734 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431617</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the immunity granted to Respondent No.1 towards interest liability, quashing the Settlement Commission&#039;s order in that regard. The Court found that the Settlement Commission lacked the power to grant immunity towards interest post the relevant amendment to the Customs Act, 1962. As Respondent No.1 did not contest this argument, the immunity was revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 09:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 734 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431617</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the immunity granted to Respondent No.1 towards interest liability, quashing the Settlement Commission&#039;s order in that regard. The Court found that the Settlement Commission lacked the power to grant immunity towards interest post the relevant amendment to the Customs Act, 1962. As Respondent No.1 did not contest this argument, the immunity was revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>