<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 731 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431614</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court concluded that upon the petitioner&#039;s deposit of 10% of the penalty amount, the recovery of the remaining 90% would be stayed. The petitioner retained the right to seek further interim reliefs from the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) directives. The Court refrained from ruling on other issues or the writ petition&#039;s maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 09:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 731 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431614</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court concluded that upon the petitioner&#039;s deposit of 10% of the penalty amount, the recovery of the remaining 90% would be stayed. The petitioner retained the right to seek further interim reliefs from the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) directives. The Court refrained from ruling on other issues or the writ petition&#039;s maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>