<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 113 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no liability to pay Service Tax due to the absence of a client-service provider relationship. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief in their non-liability was considered, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. Penalties imposed by the Commissioner under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act were set aside as the Tribunal found them unjustified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 113 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no liability to pay Service Tax due to the absence of a client-service provider relationship. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief in their non-liability was considered, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. Penalties imposed by the Commissioner under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act were set aside as the Tribunal found them unjustified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>