<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 725 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431608</link>
    <description>Under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Adjudicating Authority has a binary role: it may approve a resolution plan if the Section 30 requirements are met, or reject it if they are not. It cannot rewrite an approved plan or add fresh substantive conditions after Committee of Creditors approval, so the modification inserted in the approval order was impermissible and was set aside. A belated challenge alleging fraud, suppression and disputed MSME status was not allowed to disturb the approval, because the relevant materials were already before the Adjudicating Authority and the issue had not been timely assailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 725 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431608</link>
      <description>Under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Adjudicating Authority has a binary role: it may approve a resolution plan if the Section 30 requirements are met, or reject it if they are not. It cannot rewrite an approved plan or add fresh substantive conditions after Committee of Creditors approval, so the modification inserted in the approval order was impermissible and was set aside. A belated challenge alleging fraud, suppression and disputed MSME status was not allowed to disturb the approval, because the relevant materials were already before the Adjudicating Authority and the issue had not been timely assailed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>