https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305635 The Karnataka High Court stated that the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 did not authorise the State Government to direct allotment of sites in the 'G' category to persons in public life under the 6.8.1997 circular, because disposal of sites remained subject to the Act, the rules, and transparent non-arbitrary process. It further reiterated that once registered sale deeds are executed and conveyance is complete, title passes to the purchaser and the vendor cannot unilaterally cancel the deeds; any challenge to a void or voidable conveyance must be taken before the competent civil court under the Specific Relief Act. The impugned cancellation measures were therefore quashed. en-us Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:51:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305635 The Karnataka High Court stated that the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 did not authorise the State Government to direct allotment of sites in the 'G' category to persons in public life under the 6.8.1997 circular, because disposal of sites remained subject to the Act, the rules, and transparent non-arbitrary process. It further reiterated that once registered sale deeds are executed and conveyance is complete, title passes to the purchaser and the vendor cannot unilaterally cancel the deeds; any challenge to a void or voidable conveyance must be taken before the competent civil court under the Specific Relief Act. The impugned cancellation measures were therefore quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305635