<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellants for non-filing of returns and non-payment of tax. The Commissioner (Appeals) modified the order, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 and reducing the penalty under Section 76. The Tribunal emphasized the appellants&#039; actions under a bona fide belief, citing case law precedents, and ultimately allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellants for non-filing of returns and non-payment of tax. The Commissioner (Appeals) modified the order, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 and reducing the penalty under Section 76. The Tribunal emphasized the appellants&#039; actions under a bona fide belief, citing case law precedents, and ultimately allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>