<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1400 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305632</link>
    <description>The civil appeal was dismissed for want of merit, with the Court finding no basis to sustain the substantive challenge. The appellant was, however, granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum and request time for depositing the difference in provident fund contributions. The order did not itself extend the deposit period or grant any substantive relief beyond permitting such an application to be made before the relevant forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1400 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305632</link>
      <description>The civil appeal was dismissed for want of merit, with the Court finding no basis to sustain the substantive challenge. The appellant was, however, granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum and request time for depositing the difference in provident fund contributions. The order did not itself extend the deposit period or grant any substantive relief beyond permitting such an application to be made before the relevant forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>