<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 689 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431572</link>
    <description>A registered sale deed, once executed with transfer of possession and consideration, cannot be nullified by a later cancellation deed; the proper remedy for setting aside a void or voidable registered instrument lies under the Specific Relief Act. On the facts described, the later registered and duly stamped document was treated as a fresh transfer, so the holding period ran from that transfer date and the resulting gain was short-term capital gain. The conveyance was also read as transferring the entire property, including open land and appurtenant rights, not merely the superstructure, so capital gains could not be restricted to the building alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 689 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431572</link>
      <description>A registered sale deed, once executed with transfer of possession and consideration, cannot be nullified by a later cancellation deed; the proper remedy for setting aside a void or voidable registered instrument lies under the Specific Relief Act. On the facts described, the later registered and duly stamped document was treated as a fresh transfer, so the holding period ran from that transfer date and the resulting gain was short-term capital gain. The conveyance was also read as transferring the entire property, including open land and appurtenant rights, not merely the superstructure, so capital gains could not be restricted to the building alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>