https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305625 The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai, in a judgment by B.R. Baskaran (AM), allowed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee for the recall of an ex-parte order due to the authorized representative's non-appearance. The Tribunal accepted the reasons presented, invoking Rule 24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules to recall the order. The appeal was listed for a normal course hearing, emphasizing procedural fairness and discretion in addressing non-appearance issues. This decision highlights the Tribunal's commitment to equitable treatment and upholding natural justice principles in legal proceedings. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:38:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305625 The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai, in a judgment by B.R. Baskaran (AM), allowed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee for the recall of an ex-parte order due to the authorized representative's non-appearance. The Tribunal accepted the reasons presented, invoking Rule 24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules to recall the order. The appeal was listed for a normal course hearing, emphasizing procedural fairness and discretion in addressing non-appearance issues. This decision highlights the Tribunal's commitment to equitable treatment and upholding natural justice principles in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305625