<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 156 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31222</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore granted waiver for the balance of the pre-deposit Service Tax amount, staying its recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal held that the appellant need not include the value of materials received from clients in their construction activity, rejecting the claim for abatement on these materials. Citing compliance and legal precedents, the Tribunal ensured no enforcement even after the stay order period expired, aligning with tax law principles and judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 156 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31222</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore granted waiver for the balance of the pre-deposit Service Tax amount, staying its recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal held that the appellant need not include the value of materials received from clients in their construction activity, rejecting the claim for abatement on these materials. Citing compliance and legal precedents, the Tribunal ensured no enforcement even after the stay order period expired, aligning with tax law principles and judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>