<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1205 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305619</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the addition of service tax amounting to Rs. 4,84,771. It found that section 43B does not apply to service tax liability due to the nature of the liability and the absence of payments from the receiver of services. The tribunal highlighted that service tax cannot be included in turnover as per Rule 6 of the Service Tax Rules, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1205 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305619</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the addition of service tax amounting to Rs. 4,84,771. It found that section 43B does not apply to service tax liability due to the nature of the liability and the absence of payments from the receiver of services. The tribunal highlighted that service tax cannot be included in turnover as per Rule 6 of the Service Tax Rules, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>