<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 645 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, upholding the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s (PCIT) revision directions under Section 263 regarding tax calculations and investments. The Tribunal reversed the PCIT&#039;s directions on interest disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) and deemed rent computation under Section 23, citing insufficient inquiries by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the alleged difference in stamp valuation and purchase consideration under Section 56(2)(vii), the Tribunal reversed the PCIT&#039;s directions in part, emphasizing legislative provisions and case law. The order was pronounced on 13.12.2022, addressing various issues raised by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 645 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, upholding the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s (PCIT) revision directions under Section 263 regarding tax calculations and investments. The Tribunal reversed the PCIT&#039;s directions on interest disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) and deemed rent computation under Section 23, citing insufficient inquiries by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the alleged difference in stamp valuation and purchase consideration under Section 56(2)(vii), the Tribunal reversed the PCIT&#039;s directions in part, emphasizing legislative provisions and case law. The order was pronounced on 13.12.2022, addressing various issues raised by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>