<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 628 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431511</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act for differential consideration between guideline value and actual consideration paid for property. The ITAT agreed with the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s findings, dismissing the appeals of all assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 628 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431511</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act for differential consideration between guideline value and actual consideration paid for property. The ITAT agreed with the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s findings, dismissing the appeals of all assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>