https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31213 An apparent error in the Tribunal's earlier final order was rectified because that order had set aside interest liability without considering that the Revenue's connected appeals on the underlying tax issue were still pending. The ROM application was allowed, the final order dated 3-12-2007 was recalled, and the appeals earlier disposed of were restored for re hearing. Those appeals were also directed to be listed and heard together with the pending Revenue appeals, so the question of interest would be considered alongside the related substantive disputes. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31213 An apparent error in the Tribunal's earlier final order was rectified because that order had set aside interest liability without considering that the Revenue's connected appeals on the underlying tax issue were still pending. The ROM application was allowed, the final order dated 3-12-2007 was recalled, and the appeals earlier disposed of were restored for re hearing. Those appeals were also directed to be listed and heard together with the pending Revenue appeals, so the question of interest would be considered alongside the related substantive disputes. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31213