<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 149 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31210</link>
    <description>Repeated delay in payment of service tax and filing of returns did not justify waiver of pre-deposit of penalty imposed for service-tax default. No genuine reason was established for the recurring delays, and subsequent payment of tax with interest alone was insufficient to support waiver or reduction of penalty under the discretionary relief provision. The penalty was therefore not waived on the stated grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 149 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31210</link>
      <description>Repeated delay in payment of service tax and filing of returns did not justify waiver of pre-deposit of penalty imposed for service-tax default. No genuine reason was established for the recurring delays, and subsequent payment of tax with interest alone was insufficient to support waiver or reduction of penalty under the discretionary relief provision. The penalty was therefore not waived on the stated grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>