https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305591 The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs for possession of the property, rejecting the defendant's counter-claim as it contradicted the terms of the registered sale deed. The court found the defendant's admissions clear and unequivocal, leading to a decree on admission in favor of the plaintiffs. The court emphasized that the delay in claiming possession did not affect the plaintiffs' title. The defendant's defense was deemed frivolous, and the plaintiffs were awarded costs in each application. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:06:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305591 The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs for possession of the property, rejecting the defendant's counter-claim as it contradicted the terms of the registered sale deed. The court found the defendant's admissions clear and unequivocal, leading to a decree on admission in favor of the plaintiffs. The court emphasized that the delay in claiming possession did not affect the plaintiffs' title. The defendant's defense was deemed frivolous, and the plaintiffs were awarded costs in each application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305591