https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305597 The court held that the demand for unearned increase/transfer charges was unsustainable as the change of name and purchase of shares did not violate the conveyance deed. The court set aside the demand notices and directed the respondent to record the petitioner's name as a lessee. The writ petition was allowed, and all pending applications were disposed of. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:06:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305597 The court held that the demand for unearned increase/transfer charges was unsustainable as the change of name and purchase of shares did not violate the conveyance deed. The court set aside the demand notices and directed the respondent to record the petitioner's name as a lessee. The writ petition was allowed, and all pending applications were disposed of. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305597