<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 591 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431474</link>
    <description>HC resolved a dispute over detention and penalty for battery sales. Petitioner sold old batteries per piece via tax invoice, challenged penalty imposed by tax authorities. HC found no legal basis for detention, ruled authorities failed to justify penalty. Court set aside detention order, directed refund of penalty amount, affirming petitioner&#039;s trade practice as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 591 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431474</link>
      <description>HC resolved a dispute over detention and penalty for battery sales. Petitioner sold old batteries per piece via tax invoice, challenged penalty imposed by tax authorities. HC found no legal basis for detention, ruled authorities failed to justify penalty. Court set aside detention order, directed refund of penalty amount, affirming petitioner&#039;s trade practice as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>