<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 585 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2011-12. It emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence linking disclosed income to search findings for Explanation 5A application. The penalties were deemed inappropriate as the disclosed income did not fall under deemed concealment per Explanation 5A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 585 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2011-12. It emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence linking disclosed income to search findings for Explanation 5A application. The penalties were deemed inappropriate as the disclosed income did not fall under deemed concealment per Explanation 5A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>