https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31205 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI denied the Revenue's applications for a stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) order, as it found no compelling reasons for the stay. The Commissioner (Appeals) had ruled that the respondents, who provided jeeps for transporting goods, did not qualify as "Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator." en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31205 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI denied the Revenue's applications for a stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) order, as it found no compelling reasons for the stay. The Commissioner (Appeals) had ruled that the respondents, who provided jeeps for transporting goods, did not qualify as "Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator." Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31205