<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 574 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, restricting the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act retrospectively. The disallowance of Rs.2,85,500 was limited to 30%, granting relief of Rs.1,99,850 to the appellant for Assessment Year 2006-07. The decision highlighted the importance of fair hearing opportunities and referenced previous decisions to support the retrospective application of the clarificatory amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 574 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, restricting the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act retrospectively. The disallowance of Rs.2,85,500 was limited to 30%, granting relief of Rs.1,99,850 to the appellant for Assessment Year 2006-07. The decision highlighted the importance of fair hearing opportunities and referenced previous decisions to support the retrospective application of the clarificatory amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>