<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 573 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to treat the profit from the sale of land as Long Term Capital Gains due to the property being held for over 36 months. The Tribunal also instructed the AO to grant the deduction under Section 54F, as the entire sale proceeds were reinvested in a new residential property, despite construction delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 573 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to treat the profit from the sale of land as Long Term Capital Gains due to the property being held for over 36 months. The Tribunal also instructed the AO to grant the deduction under Section 54F, as the entire sale proceeds were reinvested in a new residential property, despite construction delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>