<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 567 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence to reject the transaction value and support the claim of &quot;prime grade&quot; PVC Resin. The denial of cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner was deemed a procedural lapse. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief in accordance with the law. The Tribunal acknowledged the potential impact of the NCLT order on government dues but based its decision on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 567 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence to reject the transaction value and support the claim of &quot;prime grade&quot; PVC Resin. The denial of cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner was deemed a procedural lapse. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief in accordance with the law. The Tribunal acknowledged the potential impact of the NCLT order on government dues but based its decision on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>