<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 566 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431449</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s revision, finding the allegations constituted a prima facie case, holding him liable due to his involvement during the relevant period unless rebutted. The court emphasized that proceedings should not be halted based on prima facie material, and the petitioner&#039;s arguments did not justify quashing the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 566 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431449</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s revision, finding the allegations constituted a prima facie case, holding him liable due to his involvement during the relevant period unless rebutted. The court emphasized that proceedings should not be halted based on prima facie material, and the petitioner&#039;s arguments did not justify quashing the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>