<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 560 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431443</link>
    <description>For exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the penultimate seller is not required to independently produce the foreign buyer&#039;s agreement copy, sale contract or purchase order when Form H and connected export documents establish the export nexus; the authorities may verify the link from the materials already on record. On penalty under rule 12(3)(g) of the Central Sales Tax (Odisha) Rules, bona fide non-production of declaration forms was treated as not warranting penalty in the first appellate order, and in the absence of any Revenue appeal or cross-objection the Tribunal could not restore or enhance the penalty. The discussion reflects relief on both exemption and penalty issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 560 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431443</link>
      <description>For exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the penultimate seller is not required to independently produce the foreign buyer&#039;s agreement copy, sale contract or purchase order when Form H and connected export documents establish the export nexus; the authorities may verify the link from the materials already on record. On penalty under rule 12(3)(g) of the Central Sales Tax (Odisha) Rules, bona fide non-production of declaration forms was treated as not warranting penalty in the first appellate order, and in the absence of any Revenue appeal or cross-objection the Tribunal could not restore or enhance the penalty. The discussion reflects relief on both exemption and penalty issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>