<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 559 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431442</link>
    <description>Liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act depends on the role actually played in the company&#039;s affairs when the offence is committed, not merely on designation. In cheque dishonour complaints, the complaint and supporting material indicated that the cheques were issued after the director&#039;s appointment, and the incorporation records described him as a promoter and non-executive director. The material was treated as sufficient at the summoning stage to suggest direct or indirect involvement in the company&#039;s business, so the plea that a non-executive designation by itself excluded liability was not accepted for quashing. Defences based on confirmation letters and similar factual disputes were left for trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:05:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 559 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431442</link>
      <description>Liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act depends on the role actually played in the company&#039;s affairs when the offence is committed, not merely on designation. In cheque dishonour complaints, the complaint and supporting material indicated that the cheques were issued after the director&#039;s appointment, and the incorporation records described him as a promoter and non-executive director. The material was treated as sufficient at the summoning stage to suggest direct or indirect involvement in the company&#039;s business, so the plea that a non-executive designation by itself excluded liability was not accepted for quashing. Defences based on confirmation letters and similar factual disputes were left for trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>