https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305576 A statutory bar on recognition of a transfer is not the same as a declaration that the transfer is void: under section 23(1)(b) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, a transfer made after the specified date remained valid inter partes, but could not be recognised for purposes of the Act while the bar operated. Once the clause was deleted, the transferee could enforce the statutory incidents of ownership, and the amendment's limited retrospective effect did not prevent continuation of the eviction suit after the transferor withdrew. The suit therefore did not fail for want of maintainability. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:11:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305576 A statutory bar on recognition of a transfer is not the same as a declaration that the transfer is void: under section 23(1)(b) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, a transfer made after the specified date remained valid inter partes, but could not be recognised for purposes of the Act while the bar operated. Once the clause was deleted, the transferee could enforce the statutory incidents of ownership, and the amendment's limited retrospective effect did not prevent continuation of the eviction suit after the transferor withdrew. The suit therefore did not fail for want of maintainability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305576