<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1606 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305567</link>
    <description>The HC required the appellant to disclose full particulars of the service tax allegedly paid under the composite scheme before 1 March 2008, including a comprehensive statement, vouchers and supporting affidavit, so the claim could be properly examined. It treated the requested materials as additional evidence relevant to determination of the dispute and directed their filing before further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=698439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1606 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305567</link>
      <description>The HC required the appellant to disclose full particulars of the service tax allegedly paid under the composite scheme before 1 March 2008, including a comprehensive statement, vouchers and supporting affidavit, so the claim could be properly examined. It treated the requested materials as additional evidence relevant to determination of the dispute and directed their filing before further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>