https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305566 The Supreme Court clarified that cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act must be tried in the jurisdiction where the cheque was presented for encashment. The Court overturned the Sessions Judge's decision and upheld the Trial Court's order, emphasizing the significance of the location of the cheque's presentation in determining trial jurisdiction. The judgment underscored the impact of legal amendments and precedents in guiding court decisions on jurisdictional matters, directing the complaint to be returned to the complainant for filing in the appropriate jurisdiction within thirty days. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:26:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305566 The Supreme Court clarified that cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act must be tried in the jurisdiction where the cheque was presented for encashment. The Court overturned the Sessions Judge's decision and upheld the Trial Court's order, emphasizing the significance of the location of the cheque's presentation in determining trial jurisdiction. The judgment underscored the impact of legal amendments and precedents in guiding court decisions on jurisdictional matters, directing the complaint to be returned to the complainant for filing in the appropriate jurisdiction within thirty days. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305566